LOKESH S vs MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD — 4/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(1)(c). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Ref - Reference
CNR: KAMS050000072026
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
4/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, MYSURU
Judge
614-Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LOKESH S
Adv. Authorized Representative
Respondent(s)
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATIOIN LTD
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 614-Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ISSUES
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-05-2026 | ISSUES |
| 29-04-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 4/2026 Court: Labour Court, Mysuru Parties: LOKESH S (Petitioner) vs. Managing Director, Executive Engineer, and Assistant Executive Engineer of Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Ltd (Respondents) Outcome: On 27.05.2026, the court heard witness examination and admitted 17 documentary exhibits (Ex.W1-Ex.W17) into evidence, including notarized letters, employee details, meeting notices, and government orders. The respondent's counsel sought and was granted adjournment time for rebuttal arguments. The case stands adjourned pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 4/2026 Court: Labour Court, Mysuru Parties: LOKESH S (Petitioner) vs. Managing Director, Executive Engineer, and Assistant Executive Engineer of Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Ltd (Respondents) Outcome: On 27.05.2026, the court heard witness examination and admitted 17 documentary exhibits (Ex.W1-Ex.W17) into evidence, including notarized letters, employee details, meeting notices, and government orders. The respondent's counsel sought and was granted adjournment time for rebuttal arguments. The case stands adjourned pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts