BASAPPA vs DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, MYSURU — 3/2026

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/S10(1)(C). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Ref - Reference

CNR: KAMS050000042026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, MYSURU

Judge

614-Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section U/S10(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASAPPA

    Adv. Authorized Representative

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, MYSURU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 3/2026 Summary In this Lok-Adalath proceeding between Basappa and the Divisional Controller, KSRTC Mysuru, the court allowed the respondent's application to set aside an exparte order. Both parties subsequently filed a joint memorandum of settlement, which was accepted by the court after explaining its contents to both parties. The matter was fully settled in accordance with the terms agreed upon in the joint memo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Referred to Lok-Adalath

    Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 3/2026 Summary In this Lok-Adalath proceeding between Basappa and the Divisional Controller, KSRTC Mysuru, the court allowed the respondent's application to set aside an exparte order. Both parties subsequently filed a joint memorandum of settlement, which was accepted by the court after explaining its contents to both parties. The matter was fully settled in accordance with the terms agreed upon in the joint memo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case