MANCHAIAH.S vs MAHESH.S — 233/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 28th March 2026.
CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS
CNR: KAMS010096622025
Filing Number
234/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
233/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANCHAIAH.S
Adv. H.C.RAJESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESH.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: CRL.R.P./233/2025 Decision: The court allowed Manchaiah S's revision petition and set aside the trial court's dismissal order dated 20.11.2025. The case involved a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for Rs. 1,50,000. Key Reasoning: The court found the trial court's dismissal for non-prosecution erroneous because the complainant had actively pursued the case by obtaining multiple warrants (2021-2025) to apprehend the accused, with delays partly attributable to the COVID-19 period. The court held that the complainant should not be penalized for the accused's evasion of warrants and deserves an opportunity to prosecute his Rs. 1,50,000 claim. Order: The matter was remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal with proper opportunity for the complainant to prosecute effectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
19-Feb-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
28-Jan-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
24-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2025
Case Summary: CRL.R.P./233/2025 Decision: The court allowed Manchaiah S's revision petition and set aside the trial court's dismissal order dated 20.11.2025. The case involved a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for Rs. 1,50,000. Key Reasoning: The court found the trial court's dismissal for non-prosecution erroneous because the complainant had actively pursued the case by obtaining multiple warrants (2021-2025) to apprehend the accused, with delays partly attributable to the COVID-19 period. The court held that the complainant should not be penalized for the accused's evasion of warrants and deserves an opportunity to prosecute his Rs. 1,50,000 claim. Order: The matter was remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal with proper opportunity for the complainant to prosecute effectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts