CHIKKANNA, DEAD BY LRS LAKSHMAMMA vs GOVERNAMENT OF KARNATAKA, R/BY CHEIF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA — 639/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O XXI, RULE II. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS010094162025
Filing Number
616/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
639/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHIKKANNA, DEAD BY LRS LAKSHMAMMA
Adv. Darshan Shetty HP
-
2.SUMITHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNAMENT OF KARNATAKA, R/BY CHEIF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA
-
2.THE CHAIRMAN, K.P.T.C.L.
-
3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,(ELEC)
-
4.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY(SWR)
-
5.THE GENERAL MANAGER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 639/2025 Summary: The dispute between Chikkanna's legal representatives and the Government of Karnataka (through KPTCL) was resolved through Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026. The respondents deposited the full claim amount of Rs. 1,08,854 via cheque, and the court closed the petition as fully satisfied subject to cheque realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Feb-2026
Await Notice To Jdr
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 639/2025
Case 639/2025 Summary: The dispute between Chikkanna's legal representatives and the Government of Karnataka (through KPTCL) was resolved through Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026. The respondents deposited the full claim amount of Rs. 1,08,854 via cheque, and the court closed the petition as fully satisfied subject to cheque realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts