ESTELAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD., vs K S PARIMALA — 5/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section U/S9. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

AA - Arbitration Main and Misc

CNR: KAMS010089322025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5/2025

Filing Date

25-11-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

25-11-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section U/S9

Petitioner(s)

ESTELAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD.,

Adv. S.T PRASHANTH

Respondent(s)

K S PARIMALA

Hearing History

Judge: 427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Refer to LA/Mediation

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

13-02-2026

OBJECTION

21-01-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Summary: Case 5/2025 - ESTELAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD. v. K S PARIMALA Estelar Constructions filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking to restrain the respondent from alienating, transferring, or creating third-party rights in a disputed property. Both parties settled the dispute through Pre-Lok Adalath conciliation and agreed to maintain status-quo on the property until an interim application under Section 17 is disposed of. The court accepted the compromise memo and disposed of the petition as per the settlement agreed in Lok-Adalath. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

27-11-2025
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 5/2025 - ESTELAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD. v. K S PARIMALA Estelar Constructions filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking to restrain the respondent from alienating, transferring, or creating third-party rights in a disputed property. Both parties settled the dispute through Pre-Lok Adalath conciliation and agreed to maintain status-quo on the property until an interim application under Section 17 is disposed of. The court accepted the compromise memo and disposed of the petition as per the settlement agreed in Lok-Adalath. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case