BOLEGOWDA DEAD BY LRS OF SHIVANNEGOWDA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 101/2025

Case under Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section U/SEC. 54. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS010087442025

Filing Number

112/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

101/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

427-II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section U/SEC. 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BOLEGOWDA DEAD BY LRS OF SHIVANNEGOWDA

    Adv. Manjunatha JK

  2. 2.MALLAJI

  3. 3.MADEGOWDA

  4. 4.RATHNAMMA

  5. 5.CHANDRAMMA

  6. 6.MALLAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The document shows a court order in Kannada for Case 101/2025 (Land Acquisition Application). The witness (PW-1) was called and sworn in on 4.6.2026. The petitioner's counsel requested the petition be allowed as per the evidence. The respondent (A.D. SLAO) sought time, which was granted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings before the court in Mysore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Objection

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Issue Notice

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The document shows a court order in Kannada for Case 101/2025 (Land Acquisition Application). The witness (PW-1) was called and sworn in on 4.6.2026. The petitioner's counsel requested the petition be allowed as per the evidence. The respondent (A.D. SLAO) sought time, which was granted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings before the court in Mysore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case