YASHODHA G vs STATE BY METAGALLI POLICE STATION — 206/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S397. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th March 2026.

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS

CNR: KAMS010086952025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

207/2025

Filing Date

17-11-2025

Registration No

206/2025

Registration Date

17-11-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section U/S397

Petitioner(s)

YASHODHA G

Adv. MUTHURAJ N.J.

Respondent(s)

STATE BY METAGALLI POLICE STATION

Hearing History

Judge: 428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

06-03-2026

ORDERS

28-02-2026

ORDERS

27-02-2026

ORDERS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary The Mysuru District and Sessions Court allowed the revision petition and directed the release of Rs. 2,15,277 frozen in a bank account to the victim Yashodha.G, who had been defrauded in a stock market trading scheme. The court found that the victim's money traced to the fraudulent account and the investigating agency had no objection to its release, making the lower court's rejection unjustified; the victim must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with a surety as a condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Mysuru District and Sessions Court allowed the revision petition and directed the release of Rs. 2,15,277 frozen in a bank account to the victim Yashodha.G, who had been defrauded in a stock market trading scheme. The court found that the victim's money traced to the fraudulent account and the investigating agency had no objection to its release, making the lower court's rejection unjustified; the victim must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with a surety as a condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case