MARUTI CUT SIZE AND TIMBER DEPOT R/BY M.JAGADISH CHANDRA(Legal Heir) vs MANJU TIMBERS — 361/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 419. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAMS010086832025

Filing Number

360/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

361/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

429-IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 419

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARUTI CUT SIZE AND TIMBER DEPOT R/BY M.JAGADISH CHANDRA(Legal Heir)

    Adv. K.S.MAHADEVA PRASAD1.

  2. 2.S.P KAVITHA 1.

  3. 3.AMULYA JAGADISH 1.

  4. 4.KRISHNA.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJU TIMBERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CRL.A/361/2025 The appellate court allowed the appeal and convicted the respondent (Manju Timbers proprietor) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, overturning an earlier acquittal. The accused purchased teak wood worth Rs.5,54,718/- on credit, paid only Rs.2,00,000/-, and issued cheque No.679405 for Rs.3,54,718/- to discharge the legally recoverable debt. The cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite admitting the cheque issuance and business transaction during cross-examination, the accused claimed it was issued as security. The court found the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions and convicted him accordingly, imposing a fine of Rs.3,60,000/- with compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 361/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.A/361/2025 The appellate court allowed the appeal and convicted the respondent (Manju Timbers proprietor) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, overturning an earlier acquittal. The accused purchased teak wood worth Rs.5,54,718/- on credit, paid only Rs.2,00,000/-, and issued cheque No.679405 for Rs.3,54,718/- to discharge the legally recoverable debt. The cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite admitting the cheque issuance and business transaction during cross-examination, the accused claimed it was issued as security. The court found the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions and convicted him accordingly, imposing a fine of Rs.3,60,000/- with compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case