STATE BY BILIGERE POLICE STATION vs NAGARAJU — 282/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S 504, 307, 329. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAMS010083072023
e-Filing Number
20-11-2023
Filing Number
282/2023
Filing Date
09-Oct-2023
Registration No
282/2023
Registration Date
20-Nov-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
429-IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0054
Police Station
BILIGERE PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BY BILIGERE POLICE STATION
Adv. PP.,MYSURU
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAGARAJU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: SC/282/2023 Court Decision: Nagaraju was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 504 (insult intending breach of peace), 307 (attempt to murder), and 329 (causing hurt by sharp weapon). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because both key witnesses (PW1—the complainant/injured father, and PW2—the alleged eyewitness) turned hostile during trial, denying the alleged assault with a machete over a property dispute. Without credible witness testimony, the prosecution could not establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Feb-2026
For Trial
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
19-Jan-2026
For Trial
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Dec-2025
For Trial
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
14-Nov-2025
For Trial
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
15-Oct-2025
For Trial
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
19-Sep-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
30-Aug-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Aug-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Jul-2025
Issue NBW To Accused Person
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Jun-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
25-Apr-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Apr-2025
Issue NBW To Accused Person
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Feb-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
18-Jan-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
19-Dec-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Nov-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
22-Oct-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Sep-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
30-Jul-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
02-Jul-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Jun-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
04-May-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Apr-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Mar-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Dec-2023
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
VI Addl DISTRICTand Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 282/2023
Case Summary: SC/282/2023 Court Decision: Nagaraju was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 504 (insult intending breach of peace), 307 (attempt to murder), and 329 (causing hurt by sharp weapon). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because both key witnesses (PW1—the complainant/injured father, and PW2—the alleged eyewitness) turned hostile during trial, denying the alleged assault with a machete over a property dispute. Without credible witness testimony, the prosecution could not establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts