INTEGRO FINSERV PVT. LTD., R/BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY CHANDRASHEKAR vs JAYARAMA.N.S — 555/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21 R 11. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS010079822025

Filing Number

514/2025

Filing Date

24-Oct-2025

Registration No

555/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21 R 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PVT. LTD., R/BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY CHANDRASHEKAR

    Adv. R. LATHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYARAMA.N.S

  2. 2.BHAGYAMMA.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 555/2025 Summary: The case between Integro Finserv Pvt. Ltd. and Jayarama N.S./Bhagyamma S. was heard before the Lok-Adalath on 14.03.2026. The counsel for the defendant (DHR) filed a memo confirming that the matter had been settled and the decree was fully satisfied. The court accepted the memo and closed the petition as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Notice To Jdr

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Notice To Jdr

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Steps

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 555/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 555/2025 Summary: The case between Integro Finserv Pvt. Ltd. and Jayarama N.S./Bhagyamma S. was heard before the Lok-Adalath on 14.03.2026. The counsel for the defendant (DHR) filed a memo confirming that the matter had been settled and the decree was fully satisfied. The court accepted the memo and closed the petition as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case