M/S ASIRVAD MICRO FINANCE LTD., R/BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY N.C. VIKAS RAO SALANKE vs LOKESH.H.M — 338/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O XXI, RULE 11. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Com.Ex. - COMMERCIAL EXECUTION CASES
CNR: KAMS010077312024
Filing Number
323/2024
Filing Date
29-Oct-2024
Registration No
338/2024
Registration Date
19-Nov-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
427-II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S ASIRVAD MICRO FINANCE LTD., R/BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY N.C. VIKAS RAO SALANKE
Adv. K.L.MUJEEBUNNISA
Respondent(s)
-
1.LOKESH.H.M
-
2.SUMANGALA.G
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd.'s petition for execution of an arbitral award was dismissed as the parties reached a settlement through Lok-adalath conciliation proceedings. The decree holder withdrew the petition by filing a memo stating it was not pressed, following the conciliators' advice that both parties had agreed to settle the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Jan-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
18-Nov-2025
Issue Attachment Of Movables
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue Attachment Of Movables
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
11-Aug-2025
Steps
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
09-Jun-2025
Notice To Jdr
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Feb-2025
Notice To Jdr
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 338/2024
Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd.'s petition for execution of an arbitral award was dismissed as the parties reached a settlement through Lok-adalath conciliation proceedings. The decree holder withdrew the petition by filing a memo stating it was not pressed, following the conciliators' advice that both parties had agreed to settle the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts