M/S.IIFL SAMASTA FINANCE LTD,REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON SHASHIKUMAR T vs SHANTHA RAJU. D. J. — 520/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21Rule11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS010077182025
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
494/2025
Filing Date
10-Oct-2025
Registration No
520/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S.IIFL SAMASTA FINANCE LTD,REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON SHASHIKUMAR T
Adv. VISHWANATHA B N
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANTHA RAJU. D. J.
-
2.KAVITHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 520/2025 Summary: IIFL Samasta Finance Ltd's petition against Shantha Raju and Kavitha was heard before the Lok-Adalath on 14.03.2026. The respondent's counsel (DHR) filed a memo stating the matter was settled and the decree fully satisfied. The court accepted the memo and closed the petition as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
05-Mar-2026
Notice
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
16-Feb-2026
Steps
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
22-Jan-2026
Issue Attachment Of Movables
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
11-Dec-2025
Steps
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
16-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 520/2025
Case 520/2025 Summary: IIFL Samasta Finance Ltd's petition against Shantha Raju and Kavitha was heard before the Lok-Adalath on 14.03.2026. The respondent's counsel (DHR) filed a memo stating the matter was settled and the decree fully satisfied. The court accepted the memo and closed the petition as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts