RAMESH.V vs C PUSHPALATHA — 330/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S415. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAMS010076742025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
329/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
330/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESH.V
Adv. N.CHENDRASHEKAR
Respondent(s)
C PUSHPALATHA
Hearing History
Judge: 427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
REPLY
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 02-02-2026 | REPLY | |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru acquitted Ramesh V of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, setting aside the trial court's conviction. The court found that the complainant failed to prove her financial capacity to lend ₹3,00,000 (she was a homemaker with no income) and that the loan transaction itself lacked credible evidence, thus the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption favoring the complainant's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru acquitted Ramesh V of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, setting aside the trial court's conviction. The court found that the complainant failed to prove her financial capacity to lend ₹3,00,000 (she was a homemaker with no income) and that the loan transaction itself lacked credible evidence, thus the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption favoring the complainant's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts