STATE BY NAZARBAD POLICE STATION vs RAVIKUMAR — 369/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S 370. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAMS010075022022
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
369/2022
Filing Date
19-10-2022
Registration No
369/2022
Registration Date
20-10-2022
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
NAZARBAD PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY NAZARBAD POLICE STATION
Adv. PP.,MYSURU
Respondent(s)
RAVIKUMAR
ABDUL REHAMAN
Hearing History
Judge: 428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination order from the District Sessions Court in Mysore (Case SC 369/2022) involving witness examination dated 20.06.2025. The witness (PW.5) significantly retracted and denied major portions of his earlier statement, claiming he did not sign documents knowingly, was coerced by police, never visited the alleged location, and cannot identify the accused. The court recorded multiple contradictions in the witness's testimony regarding signatures, the raid details, and seized items, ultimately treating him as a hostile witness per the public prosecutor's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination order from the District Sessions Court in Mysore (Case SC 369/2022) involving witness examination dated 20.06.2025. The witness (PW.5) significantly retracted and denied major portions of his earlier statement, claiming he did not sign documents knowingly, was coerced by police, never visited the alleged location, and cannot identify the accused. The court recorded multiple contradictions in the witness's testimony regarding signatures, the raid details, and seized items, ultimately treating him as a hostile witness per the public prosecutor's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts