CANARA BANK., R/BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER ELSY.K.K vs CHANDRAKANTHA N., PROPRIETOR OF M/S OMEGA CAOCHING CENTER — 218/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O VII, RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAMS010073382025

Case disposedSub Stage

e-Filing Number

16-09-2025

Filing Number

211/2025

Filing Date

20-09-2025

Registration No

218/2025

Registration Date

23-09-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/O VII, RULE 1

Petitioner(s)

CANARA BANK., R/BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER ELSY.K.K

Adv. K.K.Sujatha

Respondent(s)

CHANDRAKANTHA N., PROPRIETOR OF M/S OMEGA CAOCHING CENTER

SANTHOSH KUMAR.R

Hearing History

Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

A.D.R.

12-03-2026

A.D.R.

06-03-2026

STEPS

24-02-2026

STEPS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary - Com.O.S. 218/2025 The dispute between Canara Bank and defendants Chandrakantha N. and Santhosh Kumar R. was resolved through lok adalath (court-annexed mediation) on 13.03.2026. The court decreed the case as settled per the parties' joint memo. Defendant No.1 must pay Rs. 7,50,000 by 13.06.2026; failure results in liability for the full suit claim with interest. Court fee was refunded and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Com.O.S. 218/2025 The dispute between Canara Bank and defendants Chandrakantha N. and Santhosh Kumar R. was resolved through lok adalath (court-annexed mediation) on 13.03.2026. The court decreed the case as settled per the parties' joint memo. Defendant No.1 must pay Rs. 7,50,000 by 13.06.2026; failure results in liability for the full suit claim with interest. Court fee was refunded and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case