SHRIRAM FINANCE CO.LTD., R/BY ITS SPA HOLDER B.R.SHIVAKUMAR vs TABREZ AHAMED — 593/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O21,RULE11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 02nd April 2026.
Com.Ex. - COMMERCIAL EXECUTION CASES
CNR: KAMS010063792025
Filing Number
557/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
593/2025
Registration Date
19-Aug-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
427-II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE CO.LTD., R/BY ITS SPA HOLDER B.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Adv. VISHWAS.M.R
Respondent(s)
-
1.TABREZ AHAMED
-
2.NAYAZ SHARIFF
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 593/2025 Summary: The petition filed by Shriram Finance Co. Ltd. against Tabrez Ahamed and Nayaz Shariff was dismissed as the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo confirming the settlement, and with both the petitioner's representative and respondent present, the court dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
14-Mar-2026
Balance
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
04-Mar-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Feb-2026
Balance
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
24-Jan-2026
Balance
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
11-Dec-2025
Issue Attachment Of Movables
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Party
II Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 593/2025
Case 593/2025 Summary: The petition filed by Shriram Finance Co. Ltd. against Tabrez Ahamed and Nayaz Shariff was dismissed as the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo confirming the settlement, and with both the petitioner's representative and respondent present, the court dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts