M/S PATEL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS., R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR RAMACHANDRA M JADHAV vs M/S JOGEETHA PLASTIC PIPES., R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.R.GANAPATHY — 268/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 415. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAMS010058622025
Filing Number
267/2025
Filing Date
23-07-2025
Registration No
268/2025
Registration Date
23-07-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S PATEL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS., R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR RAMACHANDRA M JADHAV
Adv. Venugopal B
Respondent(s)
M/S JOGEETHA PLASTIC PIPES., R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.R.GANAPATHY
Hearing History
Judge: 427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
Refer to LA/Mediation
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 268/2025 Summary The appeal filed by Patel Builders and Developers against a conviction from the trial court was allowed after both parties agreed to compromise during pre-Lok-adalath conciliation. The appellant agreed to pay Rs. 3,93,323 in installments, having already paid Rs. 1,00,000, with the remaining Rs. 2,93,323 due by April 15, 2026. The trial court's conviction judgment was set aside based on this settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 268/2025 Summary The appeal filed by Patel Builders and Developers against a conviction from the trial court was allowed after both parties agreed to compromise during pre-Lok-adalath conciliation. The appellant agreed to pay Rs. 3,93,323 in installments, having already paid Rs. 1,00,000, with the remaining Rs. 2,93,323 due by April 15, 2026. The trial court's conviction judgment was set aside based on this settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts