K.MANJUNATHA vs R.SATHYANARAYANA — 244/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S415. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAMS010051102025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
243/2025
Filing Date
30-06-2025
Registration No
244/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.MANJUNATHA
Adv. CHETHAN KUMAR N.S.
Respondent(s)
R.SATHYANARAYANA
Hearing History
Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 30-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The appellate court partially upheld the trial court's conviction of K. Manjunatha under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing dishonored cheques worth Rs. 7,50,000 toward a legally recoverable loan. However, since the appellant entered into a settlement with the complainant for Rs. 6,00,000 and made partial payments of Rs. 2,30,000, the court modified the fine to Rs. 3,70,000 (the remaining unpaid amount) with a default imprisonment of six months, while holding the appellant remains liable for the full compensation amount even if default sentence is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The appellate court partially upheld the trial court's conviction of K. Manjunatha under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing dishonored cheques worth Rs. 7,50,000 toward a legally recoverable loan. However, since the appellant entered into a settlement with the complainant for Rs. 6,00,000 and made partial payments of Rs. 2,30,000, the court modified the fine to Rs. 3,70,000 (the remaining unpaid amount) with a default imprisonment of six months, while holding the appellant remains liable for the full compensation amount even if default sentence is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts