SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED R/BY ITS S P A HOLDER SHIVAKUMAR B R vs Basappa M — 479/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21 R2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Com.Ex. - COMMERCIAL EXECUTION CASES

CNR: KAMS010047252025

e-Filing Number

12-06-2025

Filing Number

445/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

479/2025

Registration Date

21-Jun-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21 R2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED R/BY ITS S P A HOLDER SHIVAKUMAR B R

    Adv. Pavithra MP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Basappa M

  2. 2.Nagamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The lok adalath closed Commercial Execution Petition No. 479/2025 after the parties amicably settled the dispute as documented in a memo filed by DHR's advocate. The court found it just and proper to record full satisfaction and close the matter as settled, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Objection

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 479/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The lok adalath closed Commercial Execution Petition No. 479/2025 after the parties amicably settled the dispute as documented in a memo filed by DHR's advocate. The court found it just and proper to record full satisfaction and close the matter as settled, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case