HDB FINANCIAL SERVICE LTD vs JAYARAMA T — 341/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O21 R11. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS010047042025
e-Filing Number
11-06-2025
Filing Number
313/2025
Filing Date
18-Jun-2025
Registration No
341/2025
Registration Date
19-Jun-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICE LTD
Adv. sampath s
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYARAMA T
-
2.GIREESH T
-
3.THAMMEGOWDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
HDB Financial Service Ltd's petition against Jayarama T, Gireesh T, and Thammegowda was heard before the Lok-Adalath on 14.03.2026. The counsel for the respondents (DHR) filed a memo confirming the matter was settled and the decree fully satisfied, which the court accepted. The petition was closed as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
25-Feb-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
20-Jan-2026
Issue Attachment Of Movables
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
11-Dec-2025
Issue Attachment Of Movables
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
17-Oct-2025
Issue Attachment Of Movables
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
22-Aug-2025
Steps
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
20-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 341/2025
HDB Financial Service Ltd's petition against Jayarama T, Gireesh T, and Thammegowda was heard before the Lok-Adalath on 14.03.2026. The counsel for the respondents (DHR) filed a memo confirming the matter was settled and the decree fully satisfied, which the court accepted. The petition was closed as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts