RAMESH vs BHAGYA — 230/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S415. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 29th April 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAMS010046712025
Filing Number
229/2025
Filing Date
16-Jun-2025
Registration No
230/2025
Registration Date
16-Jun-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH
Adv. K.S.NAGENDRA PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAGYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CRL.A/230/2025 - Ramesh v. Bhagya The appellate court allowed Ramesh's appeal and set aside his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 6,50,000. The court found that the trial court violated principles of natural justice by denying the accused cross-examination of the complainant, rushing through procedural steps on the same day, and not providing adequate opportunity to lead defense evidence or prepare arguments. The court remanded the case for fresh trial, noting that such serious procedural irregularities and the substantial amount involved warranted proper opportunity for the accused to present his defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
23-Apr-2026
Judgement
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
22-Apr-2026
Judgement
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgement
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
02-Apr-2026
Judgement
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
29-Jan-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
28-Jan-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
27-Jan-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
20-Jan-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
14-Jan-2026
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
08-Dec-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
19-Nov-2025
Objection
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
14-Nov-2025
Objection
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
04-Nov-2025
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
25-Oct-2025
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
16-Sep-2025
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
29-Aug-2025
Arguments
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
06-Aug-2025
Call For T.C.R
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
17-Jul-2025
Issue notice to Respondent
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
02-Jul-2025
Issue notice to Respondent
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
24-Jun-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
18-Jun-2025
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
17-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 230/2025
Case Summary: CRL.A/230/2025 - Ramesh v. Bhagya The appellate court allowed Ramesh's appeal and set aside his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 6,50,000. The court found that the trial court violated principles of natural justice by denying the accused cross-examination of the complainant, rushing through procedural steps on the same day, and not providing adequate opportunity to lead defense evidence or prepare arguments. The court remanded the case for fresh trial, noting that such serious procedural irregularities and the substantial amount involved warranted proper opportunity for the accused to present his defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts