PUTTEGOWDA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 146/2022

Case under Land Acquisition (mines) Act Section U/S 54. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS010040362022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

154/2022

Filing Date

10-06-2022

Registration No

146/2022

Registration Date

16-06-2022

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION (MINES) ACT Section U/S 54

Petitioner(s)

PUTTEGOWDA

Adv. RAJESHA.M

Respondent(s)

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-03-2026

OBJECTION

28-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

03-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court allowed the appellant's appeal and enhanced the land compensation from Rs. 4,55,000 per acre to Rs. 18,86,800 per acre. The court found that since the appellant's land and the land in a comparable case (LAC No.46/2017) were similarly situated in the same village, acquired for the same purpose (Varuna Canal), the higher valuation determined in the comparable case was applicable, with statutory benefits and interest on the enhanced amount granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

27-01-2026
Orders
27-01-2026
Orders
23-01-2026
Deposition
27-01-2026
Orders
27-01-2026
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the appellant's appeal and enhanced the land compensation from Rs. 4,55,000 per acre to Rs. 18,86,800 per acre. The court found that since the appellant's land and the land in a comparable case (LAC No.46/2017) were similarly situated in the same village, acquired for the same purpose (Varuna Canal), the higher valuation determined in the comparable case was applicable, with statutory benefits and interest on the enhanced amount granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case