SAVAKAIAH DEAD BY LRS UMARANI vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 387/2024

Case under Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section U/S 54. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS010031112024

Filing Number

171/2024

Filing Date

25-Apr-2024

Registration No

387/2024

Registration Date

07-Nov-2024

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section U/S 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVAKAIAH DEAD BY LRS UMARANI

    Adv. RAJESH. M.

  2. 2.SIDDARAJU

  3. 3.BASAVARAJU

  4. 4.PUTTARAJU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

  2. 2.CHIKKATHAYAMMA

  3. 3.RADHA.S.

  4. 4.MAHESH.S

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Call For T.C.R

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Call For T.C.R

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Call For T.C.R

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Call For T.C.R

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  11. 24-Jan-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  13. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  18. 18-Jul-2025

    Issue Notice

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  19. 11-Jun-2025

    Issue Notice

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  20. 25-Apr-2025

    Issue Notice

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  21. 19-Apr-2025

    Judgement

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  22. 16-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  23. 21-Mar-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: LAC(APPL)/387/2024 Outcome: The court allowed the application to condone delay and permitted appellants to contest the appeal on merits. Appellant No.3 (Basavaraju) sought condonation of 6,750 days (18 years) delay in filing a land acquisition appeal against a 2004 judgment. The court found that the rustic, illiterate appellants lacked legal knowledge and that similarly situated adjacent landowners received higher compensation, warranting a liberal approach under established precedent for rural land acquisition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  25. 15-Mar-2025

    Orders On I A

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  26. 11-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  27. 06-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  28. 20-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  29. 18-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  30. 06-Dec-2024

    Objection

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru

  31. 08-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 25-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 387/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LAC(APPL)/387/2024 Outcome: The court allowed the application to condone delay and permitted appellants to contest the appeal on merits. Appellant No.3 (Basavaraju) sought condonation of 6,750 days (18 years) delay in filing a land acquisition appeal against a 2004 judgment. The court found that the rustic, illiterate appellants lacked legal knowledge and that similarly situated adjacent landowners received higher compensation, warranting a liberal approach under established precedent for rural land acquisition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case