MAHABOOB JAN vs SYED FASI ULLA — 90/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O7,RULE1,2. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAMS010030542025

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

74/2025

Filing Date

05-04-2025

Registration No

90/2025

Registration Date

15-04-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/O7,RULE1,2

Petitioner(s)

MAHABOOB JAN

Adv. SAVANTH B S

Respondent(s)

SYED FASI ULLA

Hearing History

Judge: 427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

06-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

02-04-2026

EVIDENCE

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE

16-03-2026

OBJECTION

13-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

05-08-2025
Issue
12-12-2025
Deposition
17-02-2026
Deposition
19-02-2026
Deposition

Summary In Commercial Case No. 90/2025, witness PW-1 was examined on 19.2.2026. The court found the defendant had rented scheduled properties to the plaintiff from 2003 onwards, received advance amounts totaling ₹26.50 lakhs in 2017-2018, and paid rent regularly until 2020. The court determined that the defendant's claim of needing to return the advance was based on false testimony and a fraudulent agreement dated 5.12.2018, and dismissed the defendant's counterclaim regarding the advance payment recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Commercial Case No. 90/2025, witness PW-1 was examined on 19.2.2026. The court found the defendant had rented scheduled properties to the plaintiff from 2003 onwards, received advance amounts totaling ₹26.50 lakhs in 2017-2018, and paid rent regularly until 2020. The court determined that the defendant's claim of needing to return the advance was based on false testimony and a fraudulent agreement dated 5.12.2018, and dismissed the defendant's counterclaim regarding the advance payment recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case