STATE BANK OF INDIA R/BY ITS PRL. OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER MAHESWARI M.P vs M/S. UNIQUE MOBILE SHOP R/BY ITS PROP. IMRAN PASHA — 129/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1, R/W S 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 03rd June 2026.
Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAMS010028212024
Filing Number
102/2024
Filing Date
18-Apr-2024
Registration No
129/2024
Registration Date
30-May-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF INDIA R/BY ITS PRL. OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER MAHESWARI M.P
Adv. C.R UMASHANKARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. UNIQUE MOBILE SHOP R/BY ITS PROP. IMRAN PASHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Com.OS.129/2024 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru partially decreed State Bank of India's money suit against Unique Mobile Shop proprietor Imran Pasha on June 3, 2026. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs.5,39,051/- plus 9% per annum interest on Rs.5,19,241-04 from the suit date until realization. Key Facts & Reasoning: SBI sanctioned an MSME cash credit loan of Rs.7,00,000 to the defendant on May 11, 2021, which became a non-performing asset (NPA) due to non-repayment. The court accepted SBI's documentary evidence and testimony establishing the loan transaction and outstanding balance. Since the defendant remained absent throughout proceedings, all evidence went unchallenged. The court reduced the claimed 9.90% interest to 9% per annum considering prevailing interest rates and relevant statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
07-Jan-2026
Paper Publication
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
02-Dec-2025
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
06-Nov-2025
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Oct-2025
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
01-Sep-2025
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
31-Jul-2025
Steps
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Jun-2025
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Apr-2025
Steps
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
18-Feb-2025
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Jan-2025
Steps
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Nov-2024
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Oct-2024
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
11-Sep-2024
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
01-Aug-2024
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Jul-2024
Steps
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
31-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2024
Case Summary: Com.OS.129/2024 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru partially decreed State Bank of India's money suit against Unique Mobile Shop proprietor Imran Pasha on June 3, 2026. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs.5,39,051/- plus 9% per annum interest on Rs.5,19,241-04 from the suit date until realization. Key Facts & Reasoning: SBI sanctioned an MSME cash credit loan of Rs.7,00,000 to the defendant on May 11, 2021, which became a non-performing asset (NPA) due to non-repayment. The court accepted SBI's documentary evidence and testimony establishing the loan transaction and outstanding balance. Since the defendant remained absent throughout proceedings, all evidence went unchallenged. The court reduced the claimed 9.90% interest to 9% per annum considering prevailing interest rates and relevant statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts