RAJU.M vs STATE BY HULLAHALLI POLICE STATION — 440/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010021322026
Filing Number
440/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
440/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
429-IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
151
Police Station
HULLAHALLI PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJU.M
Adv. RAMAKRISHNA
-
2.BASAVARAJU
-
3.KUMARASWAMY K B
-
4.PUNITH R
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BY HULLAHALLI POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 440/2026 The court granted bail to three petitioners (Raju.M, Basavaraju, and Kumaraswamy K.B) accused of crimes against a woman including alleged trespass, assault, and outraging modesty under BNS sections 74, 76, and others. The judge found that while charges included non-bailable offences, they carry less than 7 years imprisonment, and the prosecution presented no prima facie evidence of guilt. Bail was approved with stringent conditions: daily attendance before the investigating officer, no witness intimidation, and immediate cancellation if petitioners commit further crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 440/2026
Case Summary: 440/2026 The court granted bail to three petitioners (Raju.M, Basavaraju, and Kumaraswamy K.B) accused of crimes against a woman including alleged trespass, assault, and outraging modesty under BNS sections 74, 76, and others. The judge found that while charges included non-bailable offences, they carry less than 7 years imprisonment, and the prosecution presented no prima facie evidence of guilt. Bail was approved with stringent conditions: daily attendance before the investigating officer, no witness intimidation, and immediate cancellation if petitioners commit further crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts