STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs MAHAZAR PASHA — 108/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section U/S135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMS010020422026
Filing Number
108/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
108/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHAZAR PASHA
-
2.NOOR FATHIMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 108/2026 Summary: The Mysuru Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed by CESC Vigilance (complainant) and accused Mahazar Pasha and Noor Fathima under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. The accused had deposited the required compounding fine amount, and the court found the offences to be compoundable in nature with no legal impediment to accepting the voluntary compromise. Accordingly, the accused were acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 108/2026
Case 108/2026 Summary: The Mysuru Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed by CESC Vigilance (complainant) and accused Mahazar Pasha and Noor Fathima under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. The accused had deposited the required compounding fine amount, and the court found the offences to be compoundable in nature with no legal impediment to accepting the voluntary compromise. Accordingly, the accused were acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts