STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs MOHINUDDIN — 105/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section U/S135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES

CNR: KAMS010020372026

Case disposed

Filing Number

105/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

ELECTRICITY ACT Section U/S135

Petitioner(s)

STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU

Respondent(s)

MOHINUDDIN

TASMIYA KOUSAR

Hearing History

Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

14-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 between CESC Vigilance (Mysuru) and accused Mohinuddin and Tasmiya Kousar. The court found the alleged offences compoundable and accepted the compromise after the accused deposited the required compounding fine amount, resulting in acquittal of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 between CESC Vigilance (Mysuru) and accused Mohinuddin and Tasmiya Kousar. The court found the alleged offences compoundable and accepted the compromise after the accused deposited the required compounding fine amount, resulting in acquittal of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case