STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs VASEEM SHARIFF — 104/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section U/S135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMS010020362026
Filing Number
104/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU
Respondent(s)
-
1.VASEEM SHARIFF
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed by both the complainant (CESC Vigilance, Mysuru) and accused Vaseem Shariff under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the alleged electricity offences were compoundable in nature and the accused had deposited the required compounding fine, the court found the compromise to be lawful and voluntary with no legal impediment to acceptance. Vaseem Shariff was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2026
The Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed by both the complainant (CESC Vigilance, Mysuru) and accused Vaseem Shariff under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the alleged electricity offences were compoundable in nature and the accused had deposited the required compounding fine, the court found the compromise to be lawful and voluntary with no legal impediment to acceptance. Vaseem Shariff was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts