STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs SIDDESH H S — 100/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section U/S 135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMS010020072026
Filing Number
100/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU
Respondent(s)
SIDDESH H S
PREETHAM S J
Hearing History
Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed by both the complainant (CESC Vigilance, Mysuru) and accused (Siddesh H S and Preetham S J) under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. The court found the alleged offences were compoundable in nature and the accused had deposited the required compounding fine, making the compromise lawful and voluntary. Consequently, the accused were acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok Adalath allowed a compromise petition filed by both the complainant (CESC Vigilance, Mysuru) and accused (Siddesh H S and Preetham S J) under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. The court found the alleged offences were compoundable in nature and the accused had deposited the required compounding fine, making the compromise lawful and voluntary. Consequently, the accused were acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts