STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs PRAJWAL — 99/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section U/S 135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMS010020062026
Filing Number
99/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
99/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU
Respondent(s)
PRAJWAL
L VEDAVATHI
Hearing History
Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalath allowed the compromise petition filed by both CESC Vigilance (complainant) and accused Prajwal and L Vedavathi under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the alleged offences were compoundable in nature and the accused deposited the required compounding fine, the court found the compromise to be lawful and voluntary with no legal impediment. The accused were acquitted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok Adalath allowed the compromise petition filed by both CESC Vigilance (complainant) and accused Prajwal and L Vedavathi under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the alleged offences were compoundable in nature and the accused deposited the required compounding fine, the court found the compromise to be lawful and voluntary with no legal impediment. The accused were acquitted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts