STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs PRAJWAL — 99/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section U/S 135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES

CNR: KAMS010020062026

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

426-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section U/S 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAJWAL

  2. 2.L VEDAVATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath allowed the compromise petition filed by both CESC Vigilance (complainant) and accused Prajwal and L Vedavathi under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the alleged offences were compoundable in nature and the accused deposited the required compounding fine, the court found the compromise to be lawful and voluntary with no legal impediment. The accused were acquitted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath allowed the compromise petition filed by both CESC Vigilance (complainant) and accused Prajwal and L Vedavathi under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the alleged offences were compoundable in nature and the accused deposited the required compounding fine, the court found the compromise to be lawful and voluntary with no legal impediment. The accused were acquitted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case