STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU vs AYISHA — 96/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section U/S 135. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMS010020032026
Filing Number
96/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
96/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY CESC VIGILANCE, MYSURU
Respondent(s)
AYISHA
ABDUL MATHEEN
Hearing History
Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalath accepted a compromise petition filed jointly by CESC Vigilance (complainant) and respondents Ayisha and Abdul Matheen under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the accused deposited the compounding fine amount and the alleged offences were compoundable in nature, the court found the compromise lawful and voluntary. The accused were acquitted and the case was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok Adalath accepted a compromise petition filed jointly by CESC Vigilance (complainant) and respondents Ayisha and Abdul Matheen under Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003. Since the accused deposited the compounding fine amount and the alleged offences were compoundable in nature, the court found the compromise lawful and voluntary. The accused were acquitted and the case was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts