RAMEGOWDA vs STATE BY EXCISE POLICE, H.D. KOTE RANGE. — 404/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010019022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
404/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
404/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
EXCISE PS, HDKote
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMEGOWDA
Adv. MANJU .S
Respondent(s)
STATE BY EXCISE POLICE, H.D. KOTE RANGE.
Hearing History
Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Ramegowda in an excise violation case involving illegal possession of 90ml of whisky. The court found that since investigation was nearly complete, the petitioner wasn't required for custodial interrogation, the offense wasn't capital, and the petitioner was a permanent local resident willing to furnish surety, bail conditions could adequately protect prosecution interests. The petitioner was released on Rs.50,000 personal bond with one surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Ramegowda in an excise violation case involving illegal possession of 90ml of whisky. The court found that since investigation was nearly complete, the petitioner wasn't required for custodial interrogation, the offense wasn't capital, and the petitioner was a permanent local resident willing to furnish surety, bail conditions could adequately protect prosecution interests. The petitioner was released on Rs.50,000 personal bond with one surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts