RAMEGOWDA vs STATE BY EXCISE POLICE, H.D. KOTE RANGE. — 404/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010019022026
Filing Number
404/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
404/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
EXCISE PS, HDKote
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMEGOWDA
Adv. MANJU .S
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BY EXCISE POLICE, H.D. KOTE RANGE.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Ramegowda in an excise violation case involving illegal possession of 90ml of whisky. The court found that since investigation was nearly complete, the petitioner wasn't required for custodial interrogation, the offense wasn't capital, and the petitioner was a permanent local resident willing to furnish surety, bail conditions could adequately protect prosecution interests. The petitioner was released on Rs.50,000 personal bond with one surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 404/2026
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Ramegowda in an excise violation case involving illegal possession of 90ml of whisky. The court found that since investigation was nearly complete, the petitioner wasn't required for custodial interrogation, the offense wasn't capital, and the petitioner was a permanent local resident willing to furnish surety, bail conditions could adequately protect prosecution interests. The petitioner was released on Rs.50,000 personal bond with one surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts