RAVIKUMAR vs PAVAN KUMAR — 402/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS010018972026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

401/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

DEVARAJA PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section U/S 482
BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA Section U/S 316(2),318(4),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

RAVIKUMAR

Adv. G.K.JOSHI

PAVAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

PAVAN KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDERS

13-03-2026

ORDERS

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

11-03-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The Mysuru Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ravikumar and Pavan Kumar, who were accused of fraudulently pledging fake gold jewelry at a bank to obtain loans totaling approximately Rs. 56.78 lakhs. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in the conspiracy with other accused persons and determined that their interrogation was necessary for the ongoing investigation to trace the fraudulent money and recover the proceeds. The court held that the serious nature of the allegations and the need to prevent tampering with evidence outweighed the petitioners' bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Mysuru Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ravikumar and Pavan Kumar, who were accused of fraudulently pledging fake gold jewelry at a bank to obtain loans totaling approximately Rs. 56.78 lakhs. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in the conspiracy with other accused persons and determined that their interrogation was necessary for the ongoing investigation to trace the fraudulent money and recover the proceeds. The court held that the serious nature of the allegations and the need to prevent tampering with evidence outweighed the petitioners' bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case