MOHAMMED THOUSIF vs STATE BY TALAKADU POLICE STATION — 393/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010018022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
393/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
393/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
TALAKADU PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED THOUSIF
Adv. Raju B
IMRAN PASHA
Respondent(s)
STATE BY TALAKADU POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 426-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Mohammed Thousif and Imran Pasha in a case involving illegal transportation of public distribution ration rice under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The judge found that while prima facie material existed against them, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, the offences were non-capital, and stringent bail conditions could address prosecution concerns. Both were ordered released on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including weekly police station reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Mohammed Thousif and Imran Pasha in a case involving illegal transportation of public distribution ration rice under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The judge found that while prima facie material existed against them, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, the offences were non-capital, and stringent bail conditions could address prosecution concerns. Both were ordered released on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including weekly police station reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts