CHANNABASAPPA.H.C vs STATE BY SARAGURU POLICE STATION — 386/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS010017722026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

386/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

386/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

SARGUR PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section U/S 482
BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA Section U/S 352,126(2),118(1),115(2),351(2),R/WSEC.3(5)

Petitioner(s)

CHANNABASAPPA.H.C

Adv. N.RAMANAYAKA

NATARAJU N

Respondent(s)

STATE BY SARAGURU POLICE STATION

Hearing History

Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDERS

07-03-2026

HEARING

04-03-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to two accused persons charged with assault, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation arising from a property dispute. The court found that the offences were not punishable with death or life imprisonment, the accused were permanent residents unlikely to abscond, and conditions could adequately safeguard against witness tampering. They were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to two accused persons charged with assault, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation arising from a property dispute. The court found that the offences were not punishable with death or life imprisonment, the accused were permanent residents unlikely to abscond, and conditions could adequately safeguard against witness tampering. They were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case