JYOTHI vs STATE BY HULLAHALLI POLICE STATION — 382/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010017682026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
382/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
382/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
223
Police Station
HULLAHALLI PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JYOTHI
Adv. KIRAN KUMAR.M
Respondent(s)
STATE BY HULLAHALLI POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
ORDERS
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 04-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (Jyothi) in a case involving charges of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and assault against a KSRTC bus driver. The judge found that the alleged offenses were non-severe (triable by Magistrate), the petitioner had no criminal record, was a permanent resident unlikely to abscond, and her co-accused was already on bail. The court released her on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety, conditional on not tampering with witnesses and cooperating with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (Jyothi) in a case involving charges of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and assault against a KSRTC bus driver. The judge found that the alleged offenses were non-severe (triable by Magistrate), the petitioner had no criminal record, was a permanent resident unlikely to abscond, and her co-accused was already on bail. The court released her on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety, conditional on not tampering with witnesses and cooperating with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts