KALAMAYIGOWDA vs STATE BY EXCISE POLICE STATION, RANGE-1 — 379/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010017652026
Filing Number
379/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
379/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
EXCISE RANGE OFFICE MYSURU, RANGE NO.1, MYSURU
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALAMAYIGOWDA
Adv. U NAGARAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BY EXCISE POLICE STATION, RANGE-1
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to 62-year-old Kalamayigowda, accused of illegal toddy selling under Karnataka Excise Act sections 13(1)(a), 14, 32, and 38(A). The judge found that since the offences are non-capital, triable by magistrate, investigation was substantially complete with 12 liters seized, and the petitioner is a permanent local resident with no flight risk, he deserved bail on a Rs.50,000 personal bond with conditions including non-tampering of witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 379/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to 62-year-old Kalamayigowda, accused of illegal toddy selling under Karnataka Excise Act sections 13(1)(a), 14, 32, and 38(A). The judge found that since the offences are non-capital, triable by magistrate, investigation was substantially complete with 12 liters seized, and the petitioner is a permanent local resident with no flight risk, he deserved bail on a Rs.50,000 personal bond with conditions including non-tampering of witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts