KALAMAYIGOWDA vs STATE BY EXCISE POLICE STATION, RANGE-1 — 379/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS010017652026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

379/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

379/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

EXCISE RANGE OFFICE MYSURU, RANGE NO.1, MYSURU

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section U/S 482
KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT 1965 Section U/S 13(1)(a),14,32,38(A)

Petitioner(s)

KALAMAYIGOWDA

Adv. U NAGARAJU

Respondent(s)

STATE BY EXCISE POLICE STATION, RANGE-1

Hearing History

Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

04-03-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Orders

The court granted anticipatory bail to 62-year-old Kalamayigowda, accused of illegal toddy selling under Karnataka Excise Act sections 13(1)(a), 14, 32, and 38(A). The judge found that since the offences are non-capital, triable by magistrate, investigation was substantially complete with 12 liters seized, and the petitioner is a permanent local resident with no flight risk, he deserved bail on a Rs.50,000 personal bond with conditions including non-tampering of witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to 62-year-old Kalamayigowda, accused of illegal toddy selling under Karnataka Excise Act sections 13(1)(a), 14, 32, and 38(A). The judge found that since the offences are non-capital, triable by magistrate, investigation was substantially complete with 12 liters seized, and the petitioner is a permanent local resident with no flight risk, he deserved bail on a Rs.50,000 personal bond with conditions including non-tampering of witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case