MAHESHKUMAR ALIAS G.M MAHESHKUMAR vs STATE BY H.D KOTE POLICE STATION — 364/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS010016752026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

364/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

364/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

H.D.KOTE PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section U/S 482
BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA Section U/S 303(1),62

Petitioner(s)

MAHESHKUMAR ALIAS G.M MAHESHKUMAR

Adv. KIRAN KUMAR.M

PAVANKUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE BY H.D KOTE POLICE STATION

Hearing History

Judge: 427-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDERS

05-03-2026

OBJECTION

03-03-2026

OBJECTION

28-02-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Maheshkumar and Pavankumar, accused of stealing two sheep (charges under BNS Sections 303(1) and 62). The court found the offences are not capital crimes, the investigation was substantially complete since the complaint was filed on 17.01.2026, and the petitioners demonstrated community ties and willingness to furnish surety. The bail was conditional on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each, weekly police attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and remaining within Mysuru District jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Maheshkumar and Pavankumar, accused of stealing two sheep (charges under BNS Sections 303(1) and 62). The court found the offences are not capital crimes, the investigation was substantially complete since the complaint was filed on 17.01.2026, and the petitioners demonstrated community ties and willingness to furnish surety. The bail was conditional on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each, weekly police attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and remaining within Mysuru District jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case