SHIVAKUMAR NAIK vs STATE BY V.V.PURAM POLICE STATION — 361/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010016582026
Filing Number
361/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
361/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
V.V.PURAM PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVAKUMAR NAIK
Adv. G.P. CHANDRASHEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BY V.V.PURAM POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Shivakumar Naik (accused No.1) in a case involving charges of criminal assault, wrongful restraint, and property damage arising from a domestic dispute with his wife. The court found that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the complainant was out of danger, the offences were non-bailable but not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner was a permanent Mysuru resident with no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 361/2026
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Shivakumar Naik (accused No.1) in a case involving charges of criminal assault, wrongful restraint, and property damage arising from a domestic dispute with his wife. The court found that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the complainant was out of danger, the offences were non-bailable but not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner was a permanent Mysuru resident with no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts