SHIVAKUMAR NAIK vs STATE BY V.V.PURAM POLICE STATION — 361/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010016582026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
361/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
361/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
V.V.PURAM PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIVAKUMAR NAIK
Adv. G.P. CHANDRASHEKAR
Respondent(s)
STATE BY V.V.PURAM POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
ORDERS
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 28-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Shivakumar Naik (accused No.1) in a case involving charges of criminal assault, wrongful restraint, and property damage arising from a domestic dispute with his wife. The court found that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the complainant was out of danger, the offences were non-bailable but not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner was a permanent Mysuru resident with no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Shivakumar Naik (accused No.1) in a case involving charges of criminal assault, wrongful restraint, and property damage arising from a domestic dispute with his wife. The court found that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the complainant was out of danger, the offences were non-bailable but not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner was a permanent Mysuru resident with no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts