SHIVAKUMAR NAIK vs STATE BY V.V.PURAM POLICE STATION — 361/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS010016582026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

361/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

361/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

V.V.PURAM PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section U/S 482
BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA Section U/S 329(4),115(2),118(1),324(4),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SHIVAKUMAR NAIK

Adv. G.P. CHANDRASHEKAR

Respondent(s)

STATE BY V.V.PURAM POLICE STATION

Hearing History

Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU

07-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

ORDERS

28-02-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Shivakumar Naik (accused No.1) in a case involving charges of criminal assault, wrongful restraint, and property damage arising from a domestic dispute with his wife. The court found that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the complainant was out of danger, the offences were non-bailable but not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner was a permanent Mysuru resident with no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru granted anticipatory bail to Shivakumar Naik (accused No.1) in a case involving charges of criminal assault, wrongful restraint, and property damage arising from a domestic dispute with his wife. The court found that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the complainant was out of danger, the offences were non-bailable but not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner was a permanent Mysuru resident with no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and ensuring court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case