NAVEEN ALIAS NAVEEN KUMAR vs STATE BY H.D. KOTE POLICE STATION — 352/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS010016142026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
352/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
352/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
H.D.KOTE PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVEEN ALIAS NAVEEN KUMAR
Adv. MANJU .S
Respondent(s)
STATE BY H.D. KOTE POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 425-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MYSURU
Disposed
ORDERS
HEARING
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Mysuru Principal District and Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Naveen Kumar in a case involving assault charges (BNS sections 352, 118[1], 351[3]). The court found that since the offense is bailable, the injury victim is out of danger, the accused is a permanent resident with no criminal record, and prosecution did not require him for investigation, bail could be safeguarded through conditions. The petitioner was released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond with a local surety, on conditions that he not tamper evidence, cooperate in investigation, and file regular bail within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Mysuru Principal District and Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Naveen Kumar in a case involving assault charges (BNS sections 352, 118[1], 351[3]). The court found that since the offense is bailable, the injury victim is out of danger, the accused is a permanent resident with no criminal record, and prosecution did not require him for investigation, bail could be safeguarded through conditions. The petitioner was released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond with a local surety, on conditions that he not tamper evidence, cooperate in investigation, and file regular bail within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts