GODDESS MARAMMA R/BY THE ARCHAKA OF DEITY SHIVALINGAIAH vs SHRI VIDHINAGARADAMMA TRUST., R/BY ITS TRUSTEES SRIKANTA MURTHY P. Advocate - H.V. SREENATH — 47/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 92. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAMS010015992023
Filing Number
47/2023
Filing Date
28-Feb-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
02-Mar-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GODDESS MARAMMA R/BY THE ARCHAKA OF DEITY SHIVALINGAIAH
Adv. MAHADEVA DESHAK
-
2.SHIVALINGAIAH
-
3.RAM SINGH
-
4.SHIVAMMA
-
5.SOMASUNDAR
-
6.RAVI KUMARA N.
-
7.MAHESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI VIDHINAGARADAMMA TRUST., R/BY ITS TRUSTEES SRIKANTA MURTHY P. Advocate - H.V. SREENATH
-
2.SHIVA KUMARA C
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
3.MAHESH P.
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
4.GANESHA
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
5.BASAVA
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
6.PRAKASHA
-
7.MANCHAPPA
-
8.CHIKKALINGAIAH
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
9.KUMARSWAMY
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
10.BHUVANESHWARA
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
11.M. SHANKAR
-
12.D. DHARMU
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
13.PUTTARAJU
-
14.N. CHANDRU
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
15.SURESH
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
16.S. NAVEENA
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
-
17.BHAGYAMMA
-
18.KAMALAMMA
Adv. SWATHI S
-
19.NIRMALA
-
20.PANKAJA
Adv. SWATHI S
-
21.SUVARNA
-
22.VENKATARAJU
-
23.NANJUNDASWAMY
-
24.NAGENDRA
Adv. H.V. SREENATH
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
09-Dec-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Oct-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Aug-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Jul-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
19-Apr-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
25-Jan-2025
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
25-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
26-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
22-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Jun-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Jun-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: MISC.47/2023 Outcome: Application dismissed. The court rejected the petitioners' request to amend their Section 92 CPC petition and plaint. The judge found the underlying petition itself lacks maintainability under Section 92, which governs suits concerning charitable and religious trusts. Section 92 requires petitioners to have an interest in the trust's welfare and management; here, the petitioners disputed the trust's very existence, alleging fraudulent creation, rather than seeking to manage or improve it. Since the amendment could not cure the fundamental maintainability defect, IA No.5 filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was dismissed on June 12, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-May-2024
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
06-Apr-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
26-Mar-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Mar-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
14-Mar-2024
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Mar-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
07-Mar-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Feb-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
21-Feb-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Feb-2024
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
09-Feb-2024
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Feb-2024
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
03-Feb-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Jan-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
11-Jan-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
08-Jan-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
04-Jan-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Dec-2023
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Dec-2023
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Nov-2023
To Hear
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Oct-2023
To Hear
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
07-Oct-2023
To Hear
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
07-Sep-2023
To Hear
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
02-Sep-2023
To Hear
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
01-Aug-2023
To Hear
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Jul-2023
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
02-Jun-2023
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Apr-2023
Steps
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
31-Mar-2023
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Mar-2023
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
18-Mar-2023
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Mar-2023
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
09-Mar-2023
Notice
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
03-Mar-2023
Notice
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
02-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2023
Case Summary: MISC.47/2023 Outcome: Application dismissed. The court rejected the petitioners' request to amend their Section 92 CPC petition and plaint. The judge found the underlying petition itself lacks maintainability under Section 92, which governs suits concerning charitable and religious trusts. Section 92 requires petitioners to have an interest in the trust's welfare and management; here, the petitioners disputed the trust's very existence, alleging fraudulent creation, rather than seeking to manage or improve it. Since the amendment could not cure the fundamental maintainability defect, IA No.5 filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was dismissed on June 12, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts