STATE BY ACB POLICE STATION vs M. NAGESH KUMAR Advocate - V.B.NAIK — 78/2019
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section U/S 7,13 (1) (d),13(2). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMS010012742019
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
78/2019
Filing Date
28-02-2019
Registration No
78/2019
Registration Date
28-02-2019
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU,MYSURU
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY ACB POLICE STATION
Adv. P.P.,MYSURU
Respondent(s)
M. NAGESH KUMAR Advocate - V.B.NAIK
Hearing History
Judge: 428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The court allowed the prosecution's application under Section 311 CrPC to summon Smt. Chandrika, Assistant Director (Physics Division) at FSL Bengaluru, as a witness. The FSL official, who conducted voice analysis on evidence CDs, was inadvertently omitted from the charge sheet despite her report being crucial evidence in the corruption case. The court found her testimony essential for just decision-making and permitted her examination, with the condition that the prosecution must adduce evidence without seeking adjournment on her appearance date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The court allowed the prosecution's application under Section 311 CrPC to summon Smt. Chandrika, Assistant Director (Physics Division) at FSL Bengaluru, as a witness. The FSL official, who conducted voice analysis on evidence CDs, was inadvertently omitted from the charge sheet despite her report being crucial evidence in the corruption case. The court found her testimony essential for just decision-making and permitted her examination, with the condition that the prosecution must adduce evidence without seeking adjournment on her appearance date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts