SIDDAMMA vs B.CHANDRASHEKAR Advocate - M.ANIL KUMAR SCINDIA — 39/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1, R/W S 26. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAMS010010562023
Filing Number
63/2023
Filing Date
07-Feb-2023
Registration No
39/2023
Registration Date
07-Feb-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIDDAMMA
Adv. K.B.SURESH
-
2.JAVARAMMA
-
3.MAHADEVA
-
4.GOWRAMMA
-
5.DEVARAJU MINOR R/BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MAHADEVA
-
6.SHIVA MINOR R/BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MAHADEVA
-
7.SHIVAMMA
-
8.PACHEGOWDA
-
9.MALAMMA
-
10.SANTHOSH MINOR R/BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN PACHEGOWDA
-
11.ASHA MINOR R/BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN PACHEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.B.CHANDRASHEKAR Advocate - M.ANIL KUMAR SCINDIA
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing On IA
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing On IA
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Oct-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
19-Aug-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
09-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
16-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
19-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
29-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
26-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
25-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
04-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
01-Jun-2024
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Apr-2024
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
27-Mar-2024
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Mar-2024
DepositionView PDF
The case involves a civil dispute regarding a development agreement and a 30 lakh rupee payment allegedly made by the Sapthagiri House Repair Cooperative Society to the petitioners (Siddamma, Javaramma, and Mahadeva). The court examined witness testimony on 13.03.2024 regarding whether the payment was received and documented in the agreement. The court adjourned the case for further proceedings, directing the plaintiff's counsel to present relevant evidence and clarifying disputed facts concerning the 30 lakh rupee transaction and associated documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
27-Feb-2024
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Feb-2024
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Feb-2024
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
03-Feb-2024
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Jan-2024
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
08-Jan-2024
Arguments
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
21-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
02-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
17-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
13-Jul-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
31-May-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
06-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
08-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2023
The case involves a civil dispute regarding a development agreement and a 30 lakh rupee payment allegedly made by the Sapthagiri House Repair Cooperative Society to the petitioners (Siddamma, Javaramma, and Mahadeva). The court examined witness testimony on 13.03.2024 regarding whether the payment was received and documented in the agreement. The court adjourned the case for further proceedings, directing the plaintiff's counsel to present relevant evidence and clarifying disputed facts concerning the 30 lakh rupee transaction and associated documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts