M/S SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD vs PUTTAMADANAYAKA — 59/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O XXI R II. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Com.Ex. - COMMERCIAL EXECUTION CASES

CNR: KAMS010008082025

e-Filing Number

25-01-2025

Filing Number

30/2025

Filing Date

25-Jan-2025

Registration No

59/2025

Registration Date

30-Jan-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU

Judge

425-Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O XXI R II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD

    Adv. BALARAJ S K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUTTAMADANAYAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The commercial execution petition filed by Shriram Finance Ltd against Puttamadanayaka was heard before the Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026. The parties reached an amicable settlement, and the court closed the petition recording full satisfaction as settled between the parties, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  5. 25-Oct-2025

    Notice To Jdr

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  7. 31-Jul-2025

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  8. 03-May-2025

    Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru

  9. 31-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The commercial execution petition filed by Shriram Finance Ltd against Puttamadanayaka was heard before the Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026. The parties reached an amicable settlement, and the court closed the petition recording full satisfaction as settled between the parties, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case