M.V.HARISHKUMAR vs NIL — 14/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section U/S 276. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.
P and SC - Probate and Succession Cases
CNR: KAMS010007742026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.V.HARISHKUMAR
Adv. Manjunatha
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: M.V. Harishkumar v. NIL (P&SC/14/2026) Court Decision: The III Additional Sessions Judge, Mysuru granted probate to M.V. Harishkumar for his grandfather Chikkahanumegowda's Will dated 19.01.2021. The court found the petitioner entitled as the sole legal heir and beneficiary, with no objections filed after newspaper publication. Key Reasoning: The Will was properly executed with two attesting witnesses (Harisha and Kiran) who testified to its validity. Documentary evidence confirmed the property was self-acquired by the deceased. The petitioner needed probate certification to transfer property ownership through revenue authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
27-Feb-2026
Enquiry
III Addl District And Sessions Judge, Mysuru
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2026
Case Summary: M.V. Harishkumar v. NIL (P&SC/14/2026) Court Decision: The III Additional Sessions Judge, Mysuru granted probate to M.V. Harishkumar for his grandfather Chikkahanumegowda's Will dated 19.01.2021. The court found the petitioner entitled as the sole legal heir and beneficiary, with no objections filed after newspaper publication. Key Reasoning: The Will was properly executed with two attesting witnesses (Harisha and Kiran) who testified to its validity. Documentary evidence confirmed the property was self-acquired by the deceased. The petitioner needed probate certification to transfer property ownership through revenue authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts