CHITRAKALA.C vs VINAYAK SHANKAR — 15/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 43 RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KAMS010006042026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
429-IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHITRAKALA.C
Adv. S.LOKESH
-
2.AKSHAY.E
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINAYAK SHANKAR
-
2.VIREN VIRAJ SHANKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
In Case MA 15/2026, the IV Additional District Judge, Mysuru dismissed the appeal filed by petitioners Chitrakala.C and Akshay.E against respondents Vinayak Shankar and Viren Viraj Shankar as "not pressed" on 17.03.2026. The appellant's counsel filed a memo requesting dismissal, which the respondent's counsel did not object to, resulting in the court accepting the memo and dismissing the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
IV Addl District And Sessions Judge Mysuru
-
23-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2026
In Case MA 15/2026, the IV Additional District Judge, Mysuru dismissed the appeal filed by petitioners Chitrakala.C and Akshay.E against respondents Vinayak Shankar and Viren Viraj Shankar as "not pressed" on 17.03.2026. The appellant's counsel filed a memo requesting dismissal, which the respondent's counsel did not object to, resulting in the court accepting the memo and dismissing the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts