BHARATHRAJ.H.L vs HARISH.H.N — 11/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 43 RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 09th March 2026.
M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KAMS010004092026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
14-01-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Judge
428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARATHRAJ.H.L
Adv. KUMARA. R
Respondent(s)
HARISH.H.N
JALANDHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 428-III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU
Disposed
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal filed before the wrong forum (III Additional District and Sessions Judge) and granted liberty to file a fresh appeal before the proper jurisdictional court (Senior Division). The court directed that any delay in filing the fresh appeal may be condoned by the proper jurisdictional court, and ordered return of the certified documents filed in the withdrawn appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court permitted the appellant to withdraw the appeal filed before the wrong forum (III Additional District and Sessions Judge) and granted liberty to file a fresh appeal before the proper jurisdictional court (Senior Division). The court directed that any delay in filing the fresh appeal may be condoned by the proper jurisdictional court, and ordered return of the certified documents filed in the withdrawn appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts