BHAGYAMMA vs N. SHEKAR — 529/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section -U/Sec.166. Disposed: Contested--ALOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r Motor Vehicles Act
CNR: KAMD710004202024
Filing Number
529/2024
Filing Date
22-Mar-2024
Registration No
529/2024
Registration Date
23-Mar-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRIRANGAPATNA
Judge
422-I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGYAMMA
Adv. D.M. MANJUNATHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.N. SHEKAR
-
2.ICICI LOMBARD GEN. INS. CO. LTD., MYSORE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Disposed
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
06-Jun-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
16-May-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
05-May-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
27-Apr-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
17-Apr-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
08-Apr-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
26-Mar-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
23-Mar-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
16-Mar-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
10-Mar-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
03-Mar-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
27-Feb-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
17-Feb-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
06-Feb-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
31-Jan-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
21-Jan-2026
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
21-Nov-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
31-Oct-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
21-Aug-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
19-Jul-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
03-Jul-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
21-Jun-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
16-Jun-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
06-Jun-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
29-Apr-2025
For Final Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
15-Apr-2025
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
04-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case MVC-529/2024 The court dismissed Bhagyamma's petition against N. Shekar and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. The respondent's counsel presented evidence that the insured vehicle (KA-11-EQ7875) had valid insurance coverage and proper notice was served, supported by documentary evidence. The petitioner's counsel contested this, arguing the notice was not properly served and the driver lacked a valid license, but the court found these objections unsubstantiated and rejected the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2025
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
21-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Mar-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
14-Mar-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
11-Mar-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
04-Mar-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
20-Feb-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
12-Feb-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
06-Feb-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
25-Jan-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
09-Jan-2025
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
30-Dec-2024
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
27-Dec-2024
Summons
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
03-Dec-2024
Summons
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
21-Nov-2024
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
15-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Nov-2024
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
12-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Nov-2024
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
09-Oct-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
14-Sep-2024
For Section 89 CPC/Counseling
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
23-Aug-2024
For Section 89 CPC/Counseling
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
09-Aug-2024
For Recording Pre-Trail Statements/Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
02-Aug-2024
For Issues
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
24-Jul-2024
For Filing Written Statement
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
26-Jun-2024
For Filing Written Statement
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
02-May-2024
For Appearance Of Parties/Advocates
I Addl Senior CIVIL JUDGESrirangapattana
-
27-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 529/2024
Summary of Case MVC-529/2024 The court dismissed Bhagyamma's petition against N. Shekar and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. The respondent's counsel presented evidence that the insured vehicle (KA-11-EQ7875) had valid insurance coverage and proper notice was served, supported by documentary evidence. The petitioner's counsel contested this, arguing the notice was not properly served and the driver lacked a valid license, but the court found these objections unsubstantiated and rejected the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts