ARJUN R vs TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE NAGAMANGALA — 32/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/SEC.13(3),OF,THE,BIRTHS AND DEATHS REGISTRATION ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAMD500003322026
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA
Judge
1429-IAddl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARJUN R
Adv. J.K. RAMESHGOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE NAGAMANGALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 32/2026 The court allowed Arjun R's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, ordering the Tahasildar to register his birth as 12.12.1987. The petitioner established through testimony and documents (non-availability certificate, Aadhar card, and school records) that his birth was never entered in the official register despite his father's notification, and the respondent presented no contrary evidence during ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
IAddl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala
-
08-Apr-2026
For Orders
IAddl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala
-
07-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
For Orders
IAddl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Criminal
IAddl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala
-
24-Mar-2026
Notice
IAddl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Nagamangala
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2026
Case Summary: 32/2026 The court allowed Arjun R's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, ordering the Tahasildar to register his birth as 12.12.1987. The petitioner established through testimony and documents (non-availability certificate, Aadhar card, and school records) that his birth was never entered in the official register despite his father's notification, and the respondent presented no contrary evidence during ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts